Wednesday, 13 August 2014

before you discipline your children

Before YouYou discipline your children 


You've had it up to here with your child's behavior -- but is it really misbehavior worthy of disciplinary action, or behavior related to your child's special needs that can be better addressed with understanding, support, and accommodations? Often, changing your actions and reactions will change your child's behavior for the better. Ask yourself these twelve important questions before you think about consequences.

1. Does my child understand what's being asked?

Frustrated Child - Kevin Dyer/Getty Images
Kevin Dyer/Getty Images
You may feel your wishes are obvious, and your child's lack of response means defiance. But if your child has problems with language, particularly with pragmatics like tone of voice, figures of speech, and body language, that message may not be as clear as you think. Make your requests straightforward and simple, free of things like sarcasm or wordplay, and make sure your child truly understands before you place blame for noncompliance.Read more.

2. Have I broken down the task enough?

Maybe you've asked your child to do something, and she's stopped right in the middle and wandered off. Before considering that a punishable offense, think about her ability to complete multi-step tasks. Have you proposed a job that's too big and complicated? Would your child cooperate if you broke it down further? Try making requests by the step and not by the completed task, and see if that increases compliance. It may also be helpful to teach your child tasks backward, so he always ends with an experience of success. Read more.

3. Does my child have trouble with transitions?

Many children with special needs have trouble transitioning from one activity to the next, and may need extra time to shift gears. Planning for transitions and giving your child plenty of warning can head off bad behavior -- and looking for hidden transitions when behavior flares up can suggest ways to restructure the situation. Read more.

4. Does my child have an executive function problem?

If you know your child has a disability that affects the "executive function" of the brain -- that is, the part of the brain that involves organization and control and foresight -- don't treat those problems as deliberate misbehavior. Your child can't keep track of things, control impulses, predict consequences of actions, or retain a useful memory of your disciplinary action for future reference. Instead, change the environment so that problems don't come up in the first place, provide lots of positive reinforcement when things are going well, and address misbehavior with a short, emotion-free time out. Read more.

5. Does my child really understand the difference between truth and lies?

Lying seems like a clear-cut offense, and it's a zero tolerance issue for many parents. But some children with special needs don't see as sharp a line between honesty and deception as we do. Poor memory, lack of cause-and-effect thinking, language impairments, and developmental delays may lead kids to say what's not so without malice. Discipline will not make a dent in the problem, so beware against forcing your child to lie and then punishing him for it. Instead, provide good supervision, so that you never have to take your child's word, and an understanding heart for fibs. Read more.

6. Is my child paying attention?

Kids who have problems with attention may miss messages about what they're supposed to do. And, though it seems contradictory, they may be able to fix attention so hard to one particular activity that they screen out everything else. If you know your child has issues with attention, make very certain that he or she is actively engaged with you when you give instructions. No fair yelling instructions from the other room, or speaking normally in a loud distracting environment, and then blaming your child for not following through. Read more.

7. Is this a battle that needs to be fought?

Some issues are just more important than others. The ones that affect the safety of your child and others have to be non-negotiable, but most everything else ought to be in play. How often do you draw the line based on your own preferences and convenience, not some true issue of right and wrong? Allow your child some wiggle room on those issues, and use it as an opportunity to teach the art of compromise. Otherwise, you're likely to get caught in a power struggle or ultimatum that will only make things worse. Read more.

8. Am I too emotional?

Never administer discipline when you're the one out of control. Children with special needs can show uncanny skill in pushing our buttons, and it's easy to get so revved up you go overboard with the consequences. Rather than roll everything back when you've calmed down, or force your child to endure a too-severe punishment just to keep consistent, excuse your overly emotional self and take a little time-out before dealing with your child's misbehavior. Keep in mind, too, that kids with special needs may overreact to stress in your environment -- so if you're not staying calm, you're a co-conspirator in that tantrum. Read more.

9. Do I have reasonable expectations?

You wouldn't punish a vision-impaired child for not seeing something, or a hearing-impaired child for not listening when you speak. So don't make a punishable offense out of something you know your child can't do, or ought to know. Consider your child's communication impairments, attention problems, developmental delays, sensory sensitivities, behavioral challenges, and other special needs before formulating your expectations, and when misbehavior seems stubborn, consider whether it could be disability-related. And when you knowingly put your child through something you know she can't handle -- like an overlong mall trip or a meal at a noisy restaurant, blame yourself for that public meltdown, 'cause you knew better. Read more.

10. Does my child need more time?

Counting to three is a staple of behavior management, but for kids with transition issues, it may not be enough time to stop one activity and start another. Instead of making it three and out, try a little longer count for your child. If your child ignores that, you may still have to administer that consequence; but in our house, a oount of ten gets my son moving the way three never did. Read more.

11. Would a bribe work better?

Positive consequences often go farther than negative ones in motivating good behavior from difficult kids -- and if nothing else, they should be as much a part of your parenting toolkit. If you're on the verge of disciplining your child, consider whether you could turn the behavior around with the right incentive, leaving both you and your child with an experience of success. Read more.

12. Do I spend as much time praising as I do disciplining?

What does it take for your child to get your full and passionate attention? If the answer is, "act up," you're going to see a lot of that. Try engaging your child with positive comments and praise more than negative comments and criticism. It may be too late to head off bad behavior this time around, but try to find something good to say to or do with your child within the next half-hour. And again. And again. Read more

Wednesday, 2 April 2014

behaviour Modification program steps


mouseBehavior Modification Program Steps


Appreciation is expressed to Dr. Retta Poe for providing a structure from which this is adapted.

Assessment
Deciding to Change Behavior
Beginning the Program
Evaluating the Program

Assessment

A. Describe the Target Behavior

Look for patterns in the behavior by finding the answer to these questions. Do NOT rely on subjective opinion but try to watch the actual behavior. An interview of the subject or of persons familiar with the subjects' behavior may be helpful if you use focused questions and get specific answers.
The global question you are trying to answer is: under what circumstances does the behavior occur and when does it not occur? What is the pattern that the behavior displays?
  • Where does the behavior occur (only at home? at school? in the presence of particular persons or objects?)?
  • When does it occur (time of day? day of week? weekends vs weekdays?)?
  • When the behavior occurs, how long does it endure?
  • How intense is the behavior (e.g., is the child talking or screaming)?
  • How frequently does it happen? per hour, per day, per week, per year (select the single most meaningful period of time).
  • What was present or occurring 5-10 minutes prior to the behavior?
  • What was present or occurring within 2-3 minutes after the behavior?
  • Who was present during an instance of the behavior? Describe how these people are related to the subject.
  • Describe in very specific behavioral terms what an instance of the behavior looks like. Describe it so an actor could display the exact behavior. Relate what was said as well as what was done and with what. Even seemingly insignificant actions could provide a clue for moderating the behavior.
    • Not "He disrupted the class."
    • Not "He yelled a lot."
    • Better: "He spoke in a volume that drowned out my voice and said, "I want my pencil back." Then he jumped on his chair and wiggled his hips while pointing at Tim, in the right hand seat. He was laughing and smiling throughout this period.
  • Sometimes, comments by significant others can be helpful. Favor behavioral examples over summative evaluations.
    • Not "He annoys others."
    • Better: "He interrupts everyone who speaks within a few minutes."
  • To evaluate the specificity/observability of your description visit:

B. Avoid these mistakes when describing the behavior

·         Confusing motivation and behavior.
    • Motives are theories, not actual behavior. They are assumptions about the cause of behavior. The word "because" signals an assumption. Don't say he/she: "wanted to" "interested in" "liked" or "disliked".
  • Inferring covert behavior from directly observable (overt) behavior. Say, "She stared at the ceiling," NOT "she was daydreaming."
  • Infusing theories of behavior into your report. Do not use concepts like "personality," or "insight" or "traits". It is even an inference to say that a particular behavior is a "habit" or "his nature." Trait names, such as "shy," "anxious," "aggressive," also fail to describe the behavior because they refer to theories about the cause of the behavior.
  • Evaluating the desirability of the behavior. Behavior is of neutral value. It just is. Its effects may be desirable or undesirable to a particular objective or to a particular person. But when describing it, avoid those judgments. To label a behavior as a problem or poor or good is
    1. vague and meaningless and thus does not contribute to understanding it.
    2. imposes a set of values that might be inappropriate upon closer inspection.
  • Using general terms such as: frequently, several, occasionally, periodically. Instead give a precise number (e.g., 2 times per day).

C. Measure the behavior to get precise data for the above questions.

There are a number of methods. Several may work for any particular behavior. There is no rule to say which is best other than that you use the method that targets the behavior you intend to change. If, for example, you want to smoke fewer cigarettes in order to save money on buying them, then you need to count the number of total cigarettes consumed per day. Counting the length of time it takes you to smoke one (while still smoking the same number) won't give you the information you need to achieve your goal.
Typically, multiple methods are used in a single project because multiple facets are of interest.

Methods:

  • Frequency: # of times a response is performed per a unit of time (e.g., day). For example, smokes 24 cigarettes every day.
  • Amount of time: the length of time a response lasts. This may be measured in terms of
    • the duration of the behavior (from start to finish), for example., takes 2 minutes or 20 minutes to smoke a single cigarette.
    • the number of intervals in which the behavior is observed occurring. (e.g., only smokes during the 9am break, never at any other time = 1 interval; vs. smokes a cigarette every hour = 18 hours.) If the behavior occurs frequently and has a clear beginning and end, then use short intervals (10-15 seconds). Less than 5 seconds is too short-- can't tell which interval the behavior occurred in. Don't use interval recording if the behavior is "continuous," that is, it persists for long periods of time with no clear beginning or end point, e.g., thumb sucking.
  • Intensity: the magnitude or size of the response. Does the subject smoke the cigarette down to the filter or takes a few puffs and puts it out?
  • Latency: the time that elapses until a response is performed. For example, how long can a person goes until they pull out a cigarette.

Before beginning your assessment

You will need to answer the following questions.
  • How many times will you collect data?
  • How long will each observation period be? (long enough to get several samples of behavior).
  • When during the day and what days of the week will you observe the behavior? Do you need to consider weekends in addition to weekdays?
  • Who and how many observers will there be? How will you train the observer to be accurate?

D. Identify a baseline (aka operant level) for the behavior.

Behavior modification is about real change. You cannot determine if real change has occurred unless you know what behavior is typical. Typical behavior is the baseline against which the success of your intervention is measured. If you fail to collect baseline data, then you have no way, let me repeat that, no way to tell if your intervention worked. Behaviorists do not rely on memory which is fallible. Without baseline data you do not have a behavior modification program.
Identifying a baseline means you collect data over a period of time without trying to change the behavior.
How long do you collect data? It depends on the characteristics of the behavior. In general, you collect enough that the behavior of interest shows a steady pattern. With some animal behaviors, that might be 1 hour. With some human behaviors, it may take several weeks.

Deciding to Change Behavior

In this phase, commitment to the program is developed and the groundwork for a successful program is laid.

A. All significant parties are involved and demonstrate commitment

Encourage participation in decisions by the subject and persons who will might have an impact on the success or failure of the program including parents, teachers, administrators, spouses, children, bosses, coworkers, etc.

B. Be specific and precise about the behavioral goals.

As a number of people are involved, clear communication is critical. Even if it is a self-change, writing our your goals and activities will ensure that you have actually been clear in your planning. It can be a self-check.
Clarity is a process of writing and rewriting. It is common, despite great effort to clarify, to discover that some behaviors remain unclarified once the program is begun. Nevertheless, do your best and it will pay off in a more successful outcome.
Include any conditions or restrictions.
Example of a precise goal:
  • Not: "To eat healthily"
  • Better: "To reduce the number of snacks (defined as ice cream, candy, or Twinkies) from one with each meal and one in the evening to one every 3rd day and to increase the number of vegetable portions (as defined by Government standards) from one with my evening meal, to 6 portions per day."

C. What are the ethical considerations?

Are there any dangers to the subject or others? For example, woman in an abusive relationship may be accused of trying to be seductive if she loses weight and be beaten as a consequence. Current health status impacts on the safety of exercise and eating programs. A person exercising in a solitary place needs to consider safety factors.
Are humane methods being used with animals? Punishment should be used very cautiously and only with close supervision.

D. Consider the total context of the behavior.

What is initiating and maintaining a behavior (or the absence of a behavior)? Another person may benefit in some way from the target behavior and undermine change efforts. For example, a spouse may want someone to eat comfort foods with her and feel neglected or judged if the subject starts eating healthily. (If you say, "The spouse can go on a diet too" consider the ethical issues above. The spouse may not wish to and that would be imposing values and the person would probably simply undermine efforts.) Some persons are rewarded by another's perceived difficulty. They will seek to continue getting their reinforcement.

Beginning the Program

A. Identify potential interventions and select one or several that match the target behavior.

Various procedures can be used together for maximum effect, although a program that is too complex is in danger of not being followed. Strike a balance between every possible procedure and too few.
Categorize your target behavior as one of the following, then see your textbook for appropriate interventions.
  • teach a never before performed behavior (reinforcement: positive and negative )
  • increase or strengthen an existing behavior (reinforcement, contingency contract, token economy, modeling)
  • extend an existing behavior
    • to a new environment (stimulus generalization; stimulus control; modeling )
    • to new behaviors (response generalization; shaping; chaining; fading; prompting; modeling)
    • over time (maintenance; intermittent reinforcement; modeling)
  • narrow an existing behavior to limited environments (e.g., only snacking in the kitchen) (also discrimination training; modeling)
  • reduce or eliminate the display of an existing behavior (extinction; time-out; response cost; desensitization; reinforcement of incompatible responses; modeling; punishment;)
Most projects will use a type of reinforcement.
  1. Identify appropriate reinforcers for the individual
  2. Specify the conditions under which reinforcement can be earned.
  3. You already trained any needed data collectors during the baseline. Continue to collect data throughout using the same methods.
  4. Apply intervention. Persist with intervention until
    1. change occurs,
    2. it is clear that change is not going to occur and the method needs evaluation and refinement
  5. On to evaluation.

Evaluating the Program

Extensive planning increases the odds that a behavior change program will result in behavior change if appropriately implemented. We cannot know if that has succeeded until we measure the behavior and compare it to the baseline.

A. Graph the results

Most data collection can be graphed (occasionally a table is more appropriate). Graphs quickly reveal progress or lack thereof. They allow for evaluation of hypotheses as to what happened (or didn't). Small variations in behavior are normal. Judge progress based on viewing multiple data collection periods (that might mean, for example, looking at a week's worth of data, graphed by days).

B. Consider trying a "Reversal"

To demonstrate true control over the behavior, remove the intervention. If the behavior returns to baseline, then the chosen intervention and not some other event is the likely cause of the change. (Of course, data is continuously collected).
With some behaviors, reversals are not ethical (head banging in autistic children) or possible (learning to speak a language).

C. Evaluate the results and reach conclusions.

Conclusions will be similar to one of the following:
  • The intervention was successful in producing change as shown by......
  • The intervention was not successful in producing change as shown by.....
  • The data offer a mixed picture. These elements were successful as shown by..... these elements were not as shown by....
In each case, elaborate on the elements that worked well and those that didn't. Evaluate the stages of the project and identify what was learned about changing the behavior that would be helpful "next time."
Behavior Modification is a science. Clear communication of conclusions and possible implications is part of any science.

C. Modify your Intervention

Based on what you learned, improve your program and try again. It is through such evaluation and thoughtful reapplication that progress is made.


Saturday, 29 March 2014

UNDERSTANDING LEARNING DISABILITIES: INTERVENTION AND PREVENTION STRATEGIES





PAPER PRESENTED BY





PSYCHOLOGIST NWOKOLO OKEY-MARTINS
PROGRAMME SUPERVISOR ACCELERATON THERAPY, LAGOS
Graduate fellow Department of Psychology,
 University of Lagos
Tel: 08039112839







AT THE 2ND ANNUAL NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON LEARNING DISABILITIES ORGANISED BY THE CENTRE FOR LEARNING         DISABILITIES AND AUDIOLOGY, ABUJA.
                              



                            OCTOBER 31ST - NOVEMBER 2ND 2006.




UNDERSTANDING LEARNING DISABILITIES.

The term Learning Disabilities (LD) was first used by Dr. Samuel Kirk in 1963 to describe children who have serious learning problem in school but no other obvious “handicap”. Today, learning disabilities is widely recognized as a separate category or condition. However, Sam Kirk and Barbara Bateman actually used the term in 1962, a year earlier in print, but Kirk’s speech to a group of concerned parents in 1963 is often cited as the basis for using the term to describe these children. Nevertheless, the difficulties that students faced due to LD were not new (Currie and Wadlington, 2000).



What is a Learning Disability?

Although the sub-field of learning disabilities is now 43 years old, it has no clear, universally agreed –upon definition. There is ongoing debate on the issue of definition, and there are more than 10 definitions that appear in the professional literature. Perhaps, this is as a result of the multidisciplinary nature of the field. However, most definitions incorporate 3 (three) criteria that must be met for a child to be labeled learning disabled.

Learning disabled children must have a severe discrepancy between potential or ability and actual achieving.

1.     Learning disabled children must have learning problems that cannot be attributed to other handicapping conditions such as blindness, mental retardation, and emotional disturbance, environmental, economic or cultural disadvantage.

2.     Learning disabled children must need intervention and special educational services (not needed by their well peers) to succeed.

The Learning Disabilities Association of America defines learning disability as a neurological disorder that affects one or more of the basic psychological processes involved in understanding or in using spoken or written language. The disability may manifest itself in an imperfect ability to listen, think, speak, read, write spell or to do mathematical calculations. (LDA, 2005).

It should be noted that there are individual differences in the type, severity and symptoms manifested by persons with LD. Every individual with a learning disability is unique and shows a different combination and degree of difficulties. The implication is that one person with LD may not have the same kind of learning challenges as another person.

For instance, a child with LD may have problem with doing math; another may have challenges with motor co-ordination or listening.
Majority of people with learning disabilities are of average or above average intelligence. Usually there seems to be a gap between the person’s potential and actual achievement. This is why LD are referred to as “hidden disabilities” the individual looks very “normal” and seems to be a very bright and intelligent person yet may be unable to perform the skill expected from someone of a similar age.

Children with LD can achieve success in school, relationships and at work if they receive appropriate support and early intervention. There is no “cure” for learning disabilities. Researchers think that LD is life-long. 

What causes Learning Disabilities?
Learning Disability is a general term that describes specific kinds of learning problems. The causes are complex and not well understood. Researches on the causes of learning disabilities suggest that they may be as diverse as the types of LD. None of the available evidences is conclusive on the exact cause(s) of LD. Nevertheless, certain observations and pointers have emerged and include:

v Learning Disabilities appear to have a genetic component. LD tends to run in families, so some learning disabilities may be inherited.
v Teratogenic causes: e.g., alcohol, lead, cocaine and (recently the suspicious) mercury (Lerner, 2000).
v Medical causes: e.g., premature birth, diabetics, meningitis Injuries before birth or in early childhood probably account for some later learning problems .Children born prematurely and children who had medical problems soon after birth sometimes have learning disabilities.
v Environmental causes: e.g., malnutrition and poor prenatal healthcare.
v Some children develop and mature at a slower rate than others in the same age group. As a result, they may not be able to do the expected school work.. This kind of learning disability is called “ Maturational lag”

According to Heward and Orlansky (2002), Learning Disabilities may be caused by brain:
                               i.            Brain damage
                             ii.            Biochemical imbalances
                          iii.            Environment (e.g. quality of teaching)

v Some learning disabilities appear to be linked to the irregular spelling, pronunciation, and structure of the English language. The incidence of learning disabilities is lower in Spanish or Italian speaking countries.
v Delayed onset of Intervention may also result to LD. The definition of LD often requires the child to have a discrepancy i.e. a difference between ability and achievement. This works against giving special instructional services to very young children; if the services could be provided when they are young, then the problems might be prevented.
v Teaching impaired or teaching disabled teachers. There is a possibility that poor quality of instruction may result in LD. However, research on this factor has not been successful (Slavin  et al,1991).

Many researchers suggest that rather than determining the cause of student’s problems, it is more important to determine the individual’s unique educational needs and design instruction that has the best chance of helping him or her to meet those needs.

SOME EARLY SIGNS OF LEARNING DISABILITIES

Children with LD may manifest an array of symptoms which includes difficulties in math, reading, writing, spelling, comprehension, and memory and reasoning skills. Hyperactivity, inattention and perceptual coordination may also be associated with learning disabilities but are not learning disabilities themselves.

Ø Reversals in writing or reading
Ø Difficulty discriminating size,  shape, colour
Ø Poor performance on group tests
Ø Difficulty with temporal (time) concepts
Ø Poor visual – motor coordination
Ø Difficulty copying accurately from model
Ø Difficulty with tasks requiring sequencing
Ø Overly distractible, difficultly concentrating
Ø Slowness in completing work
Ø Poor organizational skills.
Ø Easily confused by instructions
Ø Often obsesses on one topic or idea
Ø Poor short-term or long-term memory
Ø Impulsive behaviour, lack of reflective thought prior to action.
Ø Low tolerance for frustration
Ø Poor peer relations
Ø Poor social judgment
Ø Lags in developmental milestones (e.g. motor, language)
Ø Behavior often inappropriate for situation
Ø Overly excited during play
Ø Failure to see consequences for action
Ø Lack of hand preference or mixed dominance
Ø Disorganized thinking
Ø Overly gullible; easily led by peers

According to the Division for Learning Disabilities of the council for Exceptional Children (2006), characteristics of LD vary with age. They categorized the characteristics of LD into Preschool, Elementary and Adolescence/Adulthood.

PRESCHOOL 
Check if child has difficulties in:
·        Learning the alphabet
·        Rhyming words
·        Counting and learning numbers
·        Pronouncing words
·        Connecting spoken sounds with letters
·        Using crayons, paints, playdough
·        Remembering names of colours
·        Walking forward or up and down stairs
·        Dressing self without assistance

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
·        Speaking in full sentences
·        Reading accurately
·        Retelling stories
·        Following rules of conversation
·        Remembering routines
·        Following directions
·        Holding pencils
·        Playing with peers
·        Moving from one activity to another
·        Writing letters and numerals by hand
·        Expressing thoughts verbally or in writing
·        Computing math problem at his or her class level
·        Reciting times table, counting numbers
·        Learning new skills
·        Keeping materials neat and assignments organized
·        Modulating voice (does he speak too loudly or in a monotone?)
·        Playing age appropriate games 

ADOLESCENCE AND ADULTHOOD
Check if the person has difficulties in:
·         Staying organized
·        Remembering newly learned information
·        Understanding what he or she reads
·        Remembering and sticking to deadlines
·        Getting along with peers or coworkers
·        Following directions
·        Using basic skills (reading, writing, spelling, math)
·        Using proper grammar in spoken or written communication

SPECIFIC LEARNING DISABILITIES
Some of the symptoms described above may indicate:

Dyslexia:              A language and reading disability
Dyscalculia:         Problems with math concepts and calculation
Dysgraphia:        A writing disorder resulting in poor handwriting and illegibility
Dyspraxia:           A sensory integration disorder resulting in problem with motor coordination.

Central Auditory Processing Disorder: Difficulty processing and remembering language – related tasks

Non Verbal Learning Disorders: Problems with nonverbal cues e.g body language

Visual Perceptual / Visual Motor Deficit:           Reverses letters; inability to copy accurately, hurting and itchy eyes, problems with cutting.

Language Disorders (Aphasia / Dysphasia): Difficulty understanding spoken language; poor reading comprehension.

TYPES OF LEARNING DISABILITIES

Generally speaking, LD are brain–based processing problems (LDA, 2006). There processing problems interfere with the learning of basic skills (e.g. reading, writing math) and higher level skills, (e.g. abstract reasoning, time, organization and planning).
To identify the type of learning disabilities therefore we would consider the specific processing problem-in terms of:

Input:                  How information gets into the brain
Organization:      Making sense of this information
Memory:              Storing and   retrieving this information
Output:                Getting this information back out.


INPUT FACTOR: The brain receives information primarily through the eyes (visual perception) and ears (auditory perception). A person may have difficulty in one or both areas.

Auditory Perception: The person may not be able to differentiate between subtle differences in sounds (called phonemes) or may not be able to distinguish individual sounds as quickly as normal. They may have difficulty with auditory figure-ground. They have difficulty identifying what sound(s) to listen to when there is more than one sound.

Visual Perception Disability:  Visual perceptual difficulties may include inability to distinguish subtle differences in shapes (graphemes). They might rotate or reverse letters or numbers e.g. (6, 9, d, p, q, b). This results in misreading symbol. Some might have a figure-ground problem, confusing what figure(s) to focus on from the page covered with many words and lines. They might skip words, skip lines, or read the same line twice. If there is difficulty with visual perception, there could be challenges with tasks that require eye-hand coordination (visual motor skills) such as catching a ball, doing a puzzle, or picking up bottle.

INTEGRATION FACTORS
Once an input is made and the brain records the information, 3 integrative tasks must be carried out to make sense of the information. First the information must be placed in the right order (or sequenced). Then it must be understood beyond the literal meaning (abstraction). Lastly, each unit of information must be integrated into complete thoughts or concepts (organization).

Sequencing:         The person may have difficulty learning information in the proper sequence, e.g. wrong sequencing of numbers, alphabets, months of the year, days of the week etc. 

Abstraction:        One might have difficulties inferring the meaning of individual words or concepts. Jokes, idioms, or riddles are often not understood. They have trouble transferring.

Organization:      The person may have problems organizing materials, losing, forgetting, or misplacing papers, notebooks, or homework assignments. He may have problems with organizing his environment such as his bedroom. Some may have problem organizing time (organization over time is referred to executive function)

Memory:              Problems with working memory (ability to hold on to pieces of information until the pieces blend into full thought or concept. For example, reading each word until the end of a sentence or paragraph and then understanding the full content. “Short-term memory is the active process of storing and retaining information for a limited  period of time. “Long-term memory refers to information that has been stored and is available over a long period of time.

Language Learning Disability: Individuals with LD may have difficulty communicating their thoughts through speech, or may be able to speak but unable to answer specific questions. Some may have problems understanding what others say to them. Part of the problem results from the inability to place information in the correct brain centers and retrieve it when it is needed. It is possible to think of language output as being spontaneous or on demand. Spontaneous means that the person initiates the conversations. Thoughts have been organized and words found before speaking. Demand language means that one is asked or question or asked to explain something. Now, the person must organize his thoughts, find the right words, and speak at the same time.
Perceptual Motor Disability: One might have difficulty coordinating teams of small muscles, called a fine motor disability. For instance, the student might have problems with buttoning, tying shoes, coloring, cutting, writing and pasting.

Hyperactivity:     The individual may find it difficult to settle down, sit quiet, focus and attend. He may flit from task to task without finishing one.

Distractibility:     The person may not be able to distinguish between important and unimportant stimuli. He is disorganized because he can’t follow through on thought processes in an orderly fashion. Their attention is often diverted from the task at hand.

EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION FOR LD
Learning Disabilities vary. Individuals living with the condition also vary. No one will have all the symptoms. Also no two persons will manifest the same symptom in exactly the same way, degree or severity. As a result, no single technique or theory whether social behavioural, psychological or even educational is capable on it own, to explain or remediate Learning Disabilities in all children.
My approach will be to outline some tips and strategies that have proven effective with some LD children. They include.

Ø Design an Individual Education Plan (IEP): This must be done careful using a team approach. There should be a close collaboration among special class teachers, parents, psychologist, occupational therapist, speech-language therapist, regular class teacher and others as need may be
Ø Create learning style compatible conditions. Teach to students’ learning style strengths by involving all parts of the brain in all activities; visualization, musical/auditory, physical movement, rhythm and emotion all help learning.
Ø Capitalize on the student’s strength
Ø Provide high structure and clear expectation
Ø Use short sentences and simple vocabulary
Ø Help build self esteem by providing opportunities for success in a supportive atmosphere
Ø Use computers for drills and practice  teaching word processing
Ø Allows flexibility in classroom procedure (e.g. allowing the use of tape recorders for note-taking and test taking when students have trouble with written language
Ø Give hyperactive children frequent opportunities to move. E.g. have them sharpen pencil for other kids or tap their pen on their leg instead of a desk
Ø Make learning concrete .Majority of persons with LD do quite well when a learning task is something they can get their hands on and when it is connected to something they are curious about.
Ø Children with LD often work better alone or with a partner. Therefore, when possible, find alternatives to large group work.
Ø Encourage the use of assistive technology by making them available – and not waiting until they can do so on their own. Let them use calculators for computation; word processors and spell check programmes for written work.
Ø Children with LD work more enthusiastically on projects than on skill work. They learn better if immersed in one topic for several days, as opposed to moving from topic to topic each day.
Ø Struggling students may take tests in untimed situations – or at least be given more time.
Ø Provide lots of opportunities to practice
Ø Match teaching style to learning style .Visual people learn by seeing; auditory people learn by listening while tactile – kinesthetic people learn by touching and moving so keep that in mind. 
Ø Provide a visual schedule to list all the tasks to be performed each day.
Ø Teach the child how to purposefully relax before beginning school tasks. Ensure that the child is on a calm alert estate (learning – ready state) before commencing.
Ø A quiet soothing music might be helpful for auditory integration
Ø Provide positive reinforcement of appropriate social skills both at home and school.
Ø Break tasks into smaller steps, and giving directions verbally and in writing.
Ø A student with listening difficulties may borrow notes from a classmate or use a tape recorder
Ø Teach organizational skills, study skills and learning strategies. This is particularly helpful for people with LD.
Ø Get the child to help with household chores. Involving him can build self-confidence and concrete skills. Keep instructions simple and reward child’s effort with praise.
Ø Monitor your teaching skills and pursue professional development. Some LDs are said to result from “teaching disabled teachers”.
Ø Talk slowly. Keep conversations brief
Ø Give them advance notice, don’t take them unawares
Ø Establish eye contact while speaking to students. You may however, not insist that they maintain it, if it makes them uncomfortable.
Ø For those who are confused by too much to look at on a page, provide “windows” cut out of paper or cardboard and expose portions of the page at a time.
Ø Never do for your students what they can do for themselves.
Ø Seat students whose behaviours are distracting behind the vision of other children .Surround them with students who can model appropriate behaviours
Ø Routines are useful. Therefore, establish and use predictable routines in class activities and in transitions. Give notice if a routine will be changed or interrupted. Unpredictability throws many struggling students off-balance.

ISSUES OF PREVENTION

There is an interesting and useful debate about special education versus inclusion for children with learning and developmental disabilities.

However, for children at risk of learning disabilities neither special education nor inclusion is the answer. In place of those, we need to focus on effective prevention and early intervention. Why must we allow our children to fall behind and only then provide assistance – when ab initio, we know how to ensure that they don’t fall?  Robber slaving of Johns Hopkins University told a story or parable of the fence and ambulance:

“Once upon a time, there was a town that has in it a playground located at the edge of the cliff. Every so often, a child would fall off the cliff and would be seriously injured. At last the town council decided that something should be done. After much discussion however, the council was deadlocked. Some council members wanted to put a fence at the top of the cliff, but others wanted to put an ambulance at the bottom. “(Slavin, Madden, Karweit, Dolan, Wasik, Shaw, Mainzer, Haxby, 1991).

The question is: which option is better ….the fence or the ambulance?

I think the idea of putting the ambulance is unwise. Waiting for children to be injured and then providing them with help would be both cruel and criminal, if the damage could have been prevented.

There are many professional efforts at Preventing Learning Disabilities some of the notable prevention programmes for LD include:

(a)              Reading Recovery: This is a first-grade tutoring programme originally developed in New Zealand by Marie Clay (Pinnell, Deford and Lyons, 1988). It’s an approach that provides 30 minutes of daily one-to-one tutoring to first graders who score too poorly in diagnostic battery.

(b)             Success for All: This method was popularized by Slavin (1995). It focuses on prevention and early intervention and starts with 4 and 5 year olds.

(c)              PLD: Silver and Hagin (1990) described PLD (Prevention of Learning Disabilities) a one-to-one tutoring that focuses on perceptual skills for first graders.

There are lots of other programmes aiming to prevent learning Disabilities. The General goal is to keep children from ever needing special educational services for the learning disabled. Some common features of these programmes are:

·        There is an emphasis on  early intervention-targeting preschoolers
·        They emphasis one-to-one teacher – learning
·        They design IEP’s – tailored to individual needs.
·        Intensive stimulation

Early intervention is key to preventing and minimizing the impact that LD can have on students. While we are still struggling, in Nigeria, to develop special schools, civilized societies are transitioning from inclusion/mainstreaming to NEVERSTREAMING.

We have an urgent obligation to detect LD and intervene as early as possible. 



Thank you for your attention.



REFERENCE


Curie, P.S. Wadlington, E.M. (2000). The source for learning disabilities. East Moline, IL: LinguiSystems.
(Web: http://www.linguisystem.com)

Division for Learning Disabilities of the Council for exceptional children (2006): Characteristics of Learning Disability.

LDA, (2005). Learning Disability Association

Lerner, J.W. (2000) Learning Disabilities: Theories, diagnosis, and teaching strategies (8th ed). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

Silver, A.A., & Hagin, R.A. (1990). Disorder of Learning in Childhood. New York: Wiley.

Slavin, R.E. (1995). Every Child, Every School: Success for All. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin

Slavin, R.E., Madden, N.A. Karweit, N.L., Dolan, L., Wasik, B.A., Shaw, A., Mainzer, K.L., Haxby, B. (1991). Neverstreming: Prevention and early intervention as alternatives to special education. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 373-378